Intellinetics, Inc.

2190 Dividend Dr.

Columbus, Ohio 43228

PROXY STATEMENT

For The

20152018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On AugustJune 12, 20152018

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Why am I receiving these materials?

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Intellinetics, Inc. (“Intellinetics,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at 2015 our 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will take place at 2190 Dividend Dr., Columbus, Ohio 43228 on AugustJune 12, 2015,2018, at 12:30 PM,10:00 AM, local time. As a stockholder of record as of the close of business on July 10, 2015,April 13, 2018, the record date for the Annual Meeting, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement. We began mailing this proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card and the notice of Annual Meeting on or about July 15, 2015.May 3, 2018.

What information is contained in this proxy statement?

The information included in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, our corporate governance, the compensation of our directors and of our executive officers, and certain other required information. Our 20142017 Annual Report and a proxy card are also enclosed with this proxy statement.

What proposals will stockholders vote on at the Annual Meeting?

Stockholders will vote on threefour proposals at the Annual Meeting:

We will also consider any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting, although as of the date of this proxy statement we are not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than as set forth in this proxy statement.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote my shares?

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares:

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Each holder of record of shares of our common stock as of the close of business on July 10, 2015,April 13, 2018, which is the record date for the Annual Meeting, is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of our common stock outstanding as of the close of business on the record date is entitled to one vote on each proposal presented at the Annual Meeting. You may vote all shares owned by you as of the record date, including shares that are held directly in your name as the stockholder of record, and shares that are held for you as the beneficial owner in street name through a brokerage firm, bank, trustee or other nominee. As of the close of business on the record date, 7,123,074[17,729,421] shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote.

What is the difference between holding shares as a “stockholder of record” and as a beneficial owner in “street name”?

These terms describe how your shares are held. Several of our stockholders hold their shares beneficially through a brokerage firm, bank, trustee or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As described below, there are some very important distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Shares held of record:If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Standard Registrar & Transfer Company, you are considered the “stockholder of record” of those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by us. As a stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card for you to use. You may also vote by email, as described on the proxy card and as described below under the heading “How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?”

Shares owned beneficially:If your shares are held in an account by a brokerage firm, bank, trustee or other nominee in its name as a custodian, then you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, which are held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your brokerage firm or other nominee, which is considered the stockholder of record of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your brokerage firm or other nominee how to vote those shares, and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, because you are not the stockholder of record of those shares, you may not vote those shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from the brokerage firm or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. Your brokerage firm or other nominee has enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing your brokerage firm or other nominee how to vote your shares. Many brokerage firms and banks, as well as some other nominees, also offer voting on the Internet or by telephone. Please refer to the voting instruction form you received from your brokerage firm or other nominee for instructions on the voting methods they offer.

Can I attend the Annual Meeting?

You are entitled and invited to attend the Annual Meeting only if you are a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner of shares held in street name as of the record date or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting.

Can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

If you are a stockholder of record as of the record date, you may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name as of the record date, you may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the brokerage firm or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy or voting instructions as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?

Whether you hold shares directly as a stockholder of record or indirectly as a beneficial owner in street name, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the Annual Meeting.

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote your shares by submitting a proxy by one of the following methods:

By Email : Stockholders of record may submit proxies by email by following the “Vote by Email” instructions on their proxy cards until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on AugustJune 11, 2015.2018.

By Mail : Stockholders of record may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy cards and mailing them in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes. Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received by the time of the Annual Meeting in order for your shares to be voted.

If you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your brokerage firm or other nominee. Most stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name may vote by Internet or by telephone by accessing the Internet website or by calling the number specified on the voting instruction cards provided by their brokerage firms or other nominees, or by mail by completing, signing and dating the voting instruction cards provided and mailing them in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope. Please refer to the voting instruction card provided by your brokerage firm or other nominee for details. Since a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you will not be entitled to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from the brokerage firm or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.

Can I revoke my proxy and change my vote after I have voted?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time prior to the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting.

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote by taking any of the following actions before your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting:

For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your brokerage firm or other nominee following the instructions they provided, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your brokerage firm or other nominee granting you the right to vote your shares, by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

How will my shares be voted if I sign and return my proxy card or voting instruction form without specifying how they should be voted?

If you provide specific voting instructions with respect to any proposals, your shares will be voted as you specify on such proposals. If you are a stockholder of record and sign and return your proxy card without specifying how your shares are to be voted on some or all of the proposals, then your shares will be voted on those proposals as recommended by the Board of Directors. See “How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote my shares?” above. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and either sign and return your voting instruction form without specifying how your shares are to be voted on some or all of the proposals or you do not sign and return a voting instruction form, then your brokerage firm or other nominee may generally vote your shares in its discretion on “routine” proposals but not on proposals that are not routine. See “How are broker non-votes and abstentions treated?” below.

What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

The quorum requirement is the minimum number of shares that must be present at the Annual Meeting for us to hold the meeting and conduct business. For a quorum to exist, the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding as of the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes, as discussed below, are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

How are broker non-votes and abstentions treated?

Generally, “broker non-votes” occur on a proposal when shares held of record by a brokerage firm or other nominee in street name for a beneficial owner are not voted on that proposal because the brokerage firm or other nominee has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and does not have discretionary authority to vote those shares on that proposal. A brokerage firm or other nominee is entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on routine proposals without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares. However, a brokerage firm or other nominee is not entitled to vote shares for a beneficial owner on non-routine proposals absent instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares. Broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, but are not counted for purposes of determining the number of shares represented and voted with respect to an individual proposal, and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on any proposal.

TheWe expect that Proposals 1 through 3 - the election of directors, (Proposal 1)the amendments to our 2015 Plan, and the authorizationamendment to our Articles of the Intellinetics, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal 2),Incorporation - will be treated as non-routine proposals. If you hold your shares in street name and do not instruct your brokerage firm or other nominee how to vote your shares with respect to either of those proposals, then your brokerage firm or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your shares on those proposals and your shares will be counted as broker non-votes on those proposals.The ratification of the appointment of our independent auditors (Proposal 3)4) will be treated as a routine proposal, so if you hold your shares in street name and do not instruct your brokerage firm or other nominee how to vote your shares with respect to that proposal, then your brokerage firm or other nominee will be permitted to vote your shares on that proposal.

Abstentions are deemed present at the Annual Meeting and are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists and are generally counted for purposes of determining the number of shares represented and voted with respect to an individual proposal, except in the election of directors.

More information about the effects of broker non-votes and abstentions on the three proposals to be voted on by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting is provided in “What vote is required to approve each Proposal?” below.

What vote is required to approve each Proposal?

On Proposal 1, the election of foursix directors, the directors are to be elected by a plurality of the votes cast with respect to such director by the shares present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on Proposal 1. A “plurality of the votes cast” for purposes of the election of directors means that the foursix candidates receiving the highest number of votes cast shall be elected as the foursix directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

On Proposal 2, the authorizationPlan Amendments of theour 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, the proposal must be approved byaffirmative vote of a majority of the votes castshares present, in person or by proxy, at the shares outstandingAnnual Meeting and entitled to vote on Proposal 2.that proposal is required to approve the Plan Amendments. Abstentions and broker non-votes are countedwill have the same effect as votes against Proposal 2, while broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 2.

On Proposal 3, the Charter Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding as of the record date is required to approve the amendment. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against Proposal 3.

On Proposal 4, the ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of GBQ as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015,2018, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on Proposal 34 is required to ratify the appointment of GBQ. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against Proposal 3,4, while broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on Proposal 3.4.

Is cumulative voting permitted for the election of directors?

No, you may not cumulate your votes for the election of directors.

What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?

Other than the three proposals described in this proxy statement, as of the date of this proxy statement we are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. If any additional matters are properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting, the persons appointed as proxies in the proxy card will have the discretionary authority to vote or act thereon in accordance with their best judgment.

Who will count the votes?

A representative from Standard Registrar & TransferThe Board will appoint an inspector of elections who is not an employee of the Company Inc., our transfer agent, willto count the votes and serve as the inspector of election for the Annual Meeting.

Is my vote confidential?

Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within our company or to third parties, except (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and the certification of the vote, and (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation. Occasionally, stockholders provide on their proxy card written comments, which are then forwarded to our management and the Board of Directors.

What should I do if I receive more than one set of proxy materials?

You may receive more than one set of proxy materials, including multiple copies of this proxy statement and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards, if your shares are registered in different names or are held in more than one account. Please vote all your shares by voting each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive.

How can I access the proxy materials and annual report electronically?

This proxy statement and our 20142017 Annual Report are available on the Internet athttp://intellinetics.com/www.intellinetics.com/investor-relations/sec-filings.

Where can I find the voting results for the Annual Meeting?

The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. We will file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission within four business days of the Annual Meeting announcing the final voting results.

If I vote against any Proposal, am I entitled to appraisal rights?

Under Nevada law, stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to any of Proposals 1-3.1-4.

Who pays the costs of this proxy solicitation?

We will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing these proxy materials and soliciting votes and proxies. If you choose to access these proxy materials and/or vote over the Internet, you are responsible for any Internet access charges you may incur.

In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, we may also solicit proxies in person or by mail, telephone, facsimile, email or other means of communication by our directors, officers and employees, but we will not provide any additional or special compensation for such soliciting activities.

We will request that brokerage houses, banks, nominees, trustees and other custodians forward proxy solicitation materials for shares held of record by them to the beneficial owners of such shares, and, upon request, we will reimburse those custodians for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in forwarding those materials.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We believe that our corporate governance principles and practices provide an important framework to ensure that our company is managed on a sound basis for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. Our Board of Directors is developingcontinues to develop its corporate governance policies and practices in light of the recent changes atcurrent operations of the Company to meet laws and regulations, including the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and best practices in corporate governance.

Board Composition

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors, currently consisting of six members. We believe that our corporate governance principles and practices provide an important framework to ensure that our company is managed on a sound basis for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. Our Board of Directors has developed its corporate governance policies and practices to meet laws and regulations, including the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and best practices in corporate governance.

Director Independence

In accordance with Rule 407(c)(a)Item 407(a)(1)(ii) of Regulation S-K, we are not a listed issuer and we use the definition of independence as set forth in the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Currently, we have 5the Board consists of six directors, and we haveof which independent directors asconstitute a majority of our Board. It is anticipated that, inIn the near future, the boardBoard of directors willDirectors may recruit additional independent directors to join the Board and also our Board committees. The charters of both our compensation committeeAudit Committee and audit committeesNominating and Corporate Governance Committee require that all members of each committee be independent. Currently, Robert C. Schroeder, Rye D’Orazio, Murray Gross,Roger Kahn, and Sophie Pibouin serve as our independent directors. When determining the independence of Robert C. Schroeder, the Board considered his affiliation with Taglich Brothers, which has been retained by the Company as a Placement Agent from time to time including in October 2017, and his appointment by Taglich as a director under the terms of a Placement Agent Agreement between the Company and Taglich Brothers. The audit and compensation committees are both comprised of independent directors: Murray Gross, Robert Schroeder, and Rye D’Orazio. The nominating committee is also comprised of independent directors: Murray Gross, Robert Schroeder, and Sophie Pibouin.

Departure of Directors and Election of Directors

On March 20, 2015, Sophie Pibouin was elected as an additional Director. On April 30, 2015, A. Michael Chretien and Thomas D. Moss both resigned from the Board, and the Company thanks them both for their Board service over the past three years. Neither of their resignations were as a result of any disagreements with the Company. Additionally on April 30, 2015, Murray Gross was elected as an additional Director and Chairman of the Board.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors, which currently consists of fivesix directors, meets regularly throughout the year and holds special meetings whenever circumstances require. The Board of Directors held a total of 4 meetings during 2014.2017. During 2014,2017, each director attended from 75% to 100% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of the committees of the Board on which such director served, and our directors in the aggregate attended 93%100% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which they served.

Executive Sessions

Executive sessions of independent directors, without any management director or other members of management being present, are held at the request of the independent directors as they deem necessary or appropriate. The sessions may be held in conjunction with a Board committee meeting at which no management director is present. Any independent director can request that additional executive sessions be scheduled.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders

The Board of Directors expects all directors to attend each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except where the failure to attend is due to unavoidable or unforeseeable circumstances.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has established a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The membership of each committee and its functions, duties and responsibilities are discussed below. Each committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by our Board. Each member of each of these Board committees is an independent director.

Audit Committee

Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the of the Exchange Act. Currently, the Audit Committee consists of Rye D’Orazio, Robert Schroeder, and Roger Kahn (elected October 5, 2017). In 2014,2017, the members of the Audit Committee were Rye D’Orazio, and Robert C. Schroeder. On May 13, 2015, the Board of Directors electedSchroeder, and Murray Gross to also serveuntil October 5, 2017, on the audit committee.which date Murray Gross resigned and was replaced by Roger Kahn. The Board of Directors has determined that all members are independent under our standards of director independence. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Robert C. Schroeder qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee met four times during 2014.2017.

The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight and monitoring responsibilities relating to:

The Audit Committee’s duties and responsibilities include:

The Audit Committee performs its functions and responsibilities under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors and attachedDirectors. A current copy of the Audit Committee Charter was included as Appendix Ban appendix to thisour Proxy Statement.Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is available athttp://www.intellinetics.com/investor-relations/sec-filings.

Compensation Committee

Our Board of Directors has established a Compensation Committee. In 2014,2017, the members of the Compensation Committee were Robert C. Schroeder, Rye D’Orazio, and Rye D’Orazio.Murray Gross until October 5, 2017. On May 13, 2015,October 5, 2017, Murray Gross resigned and the Board of Directors elected Murray GrossSophie Pibouin to also serve on the auditcompensation committee. The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent under our standards of director independence. In addition, each member of the Compensation Committee meets the definition of a “non-employee director” under Section 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and of an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Compensation Committee did not meet during 2014.2017, but did take several actions by unanimous written consent.

The primary purposes of the Compensation Committee are to review and approve the compensation of our executive officers and to oversee our compensation plans and policies generally. The Compensation Committee’s duties and responsibilities include:

The Compensation Committee does not generally exercise its power to delegate its authority to subcommittees and officers. The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to retain, approve fees for and terminate independent experts, consultants and advisors as it deems necessary to assist in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. To date, the Compensation Committee has not engaged an independent compensation consultant.

While the Compensation Committee gives significant weight to the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee is responsible for making the final decisions on executive compensation matters and exercises its discretion and authority in approving, modifying or rejecting these recommendations.

The Compensation Committee performs its functions and responsibilities under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors and attached Appendix CDirectors. A current copy of the Compensation Committee Charter was included as an appendix to thisour Proxy Statement.Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is available at http://www.intellinetics.com/investor-relations/sec-filings.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Board of Directors has established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as of May 13, 2015. TheCommittee. In 2017, the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee arewere Robert C. Schroeder, Murray Gross, and Sophie Pibouin.Pibouin until October 5, 2017. On October 5, 2017, Murray Gross resigned and the Board of Directors elected Rye D’Orazio to also serve on the nominating and corporate governance committee. The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent under our standards of director independence. In addition, each member of theThe Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the definition of a “non-employee director” under Section 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and of an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).did not meet during 2017, but did take action by unanimous written consent.

The primary purposes of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are to:

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee unanimously recommended the five nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting, and that recommendation was unanimously approved by the Board of Directors.

The Nominating Committee performs its functions and responsibilities under a written charter adopted by the Board of DirectorsDirectors. A current copy of the Nominating and attachedCorporate Governance Committee Charter was included as Appendix Dan appendix to thisour Proxy Statement.Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is available at http://www.intellinetics.com/investor-relations/sec-filings.

Full Board Operates as Risk Committee

The functions of a Risk Committee are performed by the full Board of Directors. In the future as we are able to attract and retain additional directors, the Board envisions having a separate Risk Committee comprised of independent directors.

The primary functions performed by the Board in lieu of a separate Risk Committee are:

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors has determined that at the present time it is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders to separate the roles and offices of the Chairman of the Board from the Chief Executive Officer in recognition of the differences between their roles, thereby allowing our Chief Executive Officer to focus on the day-to-day running of our company. The Board determined that this structure is optimal for us under our current circumstances because it allows Matthew L. Chretien,James F. DeSocio, our Chief Executive Officer to devote his full attention and energy to setting and executing the strategic plan for our company and to providing day-to-day management and leadership of our company and our business and affairs, while allowing our Chairman to lead and direct Board meetings and to facilitate other Board activities and the flow of information between management and directors. During 2014, A. Michael Chretien served as ourOver the two most recently completed fiscal years, the Chairman of the Board has been Robert Schroeder, from October 5, 2017 to present and as ofMurray Gross, from April 30, 2015 Murray Gross Mr. Chretien as our Chairman of the Board.to October 5, 2017.

We believe that this leadership structure enhances the accountability of the Chief Executive Officer to the Board, strengthens the Board’s independence from management and provides the appropriate leadership to help ensure effective risk oversight by the Board.

The offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer have been held by separate persons since 2012. However, the Board of Directors recognizes that circumstances may change over time. Accordingly, the Board of Directors has not adopted a formal policy requiring us to separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer but rather believes it is important to retain its flexibility to allocate the responsibilities of the offices of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer from time to time in a manner that is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders based upon then prevailing circumstances. We believe our current leadership structure is serving the best interests of our company and our stockholders.

Executive SessionsNominations of Directors

Executive sessions of independent directors, without any management director or other members of management being present, are held at the request of the independent directors as they deem necessary or appropriate. The sessions may be held in conjunction with a Board committee meeting at which no management director is present. Any independent director can request that additional executive sessions be scheduled.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders

The Board of Directors expects all directors to attend each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except where the failure to attend is due to unavoidable or unforeseeable circumstances.

Nominations of Directors

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the appropriate size and composition of the Board of Directors, the needs and the respective committees of the Board, and the qualifications of candidates in light of those needs.

In selecting candidates for nomination at an annual meeting of stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee begins by determining whether the incumbent directors whose terms expire at that meeting desire and are qualified to continue their service on the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the continuing service of qualified incumbents promotes stability and continuity in the boardroom, giving us the benefit of the familiarity and insight into our affairs that our directors have accumulated during their tenure, while contributing to the Board’s ability to work as a collective body. Accordingly, it is the policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, absent special circumstances, to nominate qualified incumbent directors who continue to satisfy the criteria for membership on the Board, and who the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes will continue to make important contributions to the Board.

If there are Board positions for which the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will not be re-nominating a qualified incumbent, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider recommendations for director nominees from a wide variety of sources, including Board members, management, business contacts, stockholders and other appropriate sources. In evaluating such recommendations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board of Directors and to address the criteria for membership set forth below under “—Qualifications of Nominees for Director.”

The terms of Matthew L. Chretien, Rye D’Orazio, Robert Schroeder, Murray Gross, and Sophie Pibouin expire at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, five persons will be elected as directors at the Annual Meeting. Matthew L. Chretien, Rye D’Orazio, Robert Schroeder, Murray Gross, and Sophie Pibouin were unanimously recommended for re-election by the Board, based upon their qualifications, expertise, skills and upon their prior experience on our Board.

Qualifications of Nominees for Director

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing the requisite qualifications and skills of director candidates in the context of the current composition of the Board, our operating requirements and the long-term interests of our stockholders. While the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not established specific requirements or policies regarding age, education, years of experience, diversity or specific types of skills for potential candidates, it analyzes certain criteria and qualifications that candidates for membership on the Board of Directors should possess. No particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. Except in limited and exceptional circumstances, each candidate to serve on the Board of Directors should have the following qualifications:

From time to time the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may identify certain other skills or attributes as being particularly desirable to help meet specific Board needs that have arisen. While our Board has not adopted a specific or formal policy on diversity with respect to directors, they share a commitment to an inclusive culture, endorse equal opportunity principles and practices and seek nominees with a broad diversity of experience, professions, skills, geographic representation and backgrounds. We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of the members of the Board, considered as a group, should provide a broad mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. The Board is committed to nondiscrimination on the basis of gender, race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any other basis proscribed by law in selecting nominees.

Recommendations and Nominations by Stockholders

The policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to consider properly submitted written nominations from stockholders for nominees for director. In general, persons properly recommended by stockholders as nominees for director are evaluated on the same basis as candidates recommended by other sources. Any stockholder recommendations for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should include the candidate’s name, biographical information, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and us, personal references, a statement of recommendation of the candidate from the stockholder, a description of the shares beneficially owned by the stockholder, a description of all arrangements between the candidate and the recommending stockholder and any other person pursuant to which the candidate is being recommended, a written indication of the candidate’s willingness to serve on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a written indication to provide such other information as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may reasonably request.

Nominations by stockholders for director candidates must be addressed to:

Intellinetics, Inc.

2190 Dividend Dr.

Columbus, Ohio 43228

Attention: Chief Financial Officer

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

Risk is inherent in every business. We face a number of risks, including operational, financial, legal, regulatory, safety, strategic and reputational risks. While management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks we face, the role of our Board is to engage in the oversight of risk management and encourage management to promote a culture that actively manages risks as a part of our corporate strategy and operations. The Board’s role in the risk oversight process includes regular communication with members of senior management on areas of material risk to us, which enables the Board to understand our risk identification, assessment and management and our risk mitigation strategies. There is not separate Risk Committee.

Each Board committee considers risk within its areas of responsibilities and keeps the Board regularly informed through committee reports about such risks. The Audit Committee assists the Board with respect to risk management primarily in the areas of accounting, financial reporting, internal controls and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Compensation Committee assists the Board primarily with respect to the management of risks related to our compensation programs, policies and practices. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board primarily with respect to the management of risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure and with corporate governance. This allocation of risk oversight responsibilities enables the Board of Directors and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role. The full Board considers our risk profile and focus on the most significant risk factors facing us with the goal of ensuring that all material risks are identified and appropriate risk mitigation measures are implemented.

We believe that the Board’s leadership structure, as discussed above, is consistent with the roles of the Board and the Board committees in risk oversight. The Board has found that its current structure, with the separation of the roles of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, supports the Board’s risk oversight activities, because the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management have responsibility for the management of risk and our Board, led by our Chairman, provides oversight of that risk management, and because various aspects of risk oversight are allocated among the committees of the Board within their areas of responsibility.

Legal Proceedings

We are not aware of any material proceedings in which any of our directors, executive officers or affiliates, any owner of record or beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder is a party adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to us.

Codes of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics, each designed to encourage our directors, officers and employees to act with the highest level of integrity. This code is available as Appendix E, and on the Investor Relations section of our website atwww.intellinetics.com.

The Intellinetics, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is a code of conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. Under the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, each officer, director and employee is required to maintain a commitment to high standards of business conduct and ethics. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers many areas of professional conduct, including conflicts of interest, protection of confidential information, and strict adherence to laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. Directors, officers and employees are required to report any conduct that they believe in good faith to be an actual or apparent violation of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

If we make any amendment to, or grant any waiver from a provision of, our code of conduct with respect to any director, executive officer or senior financial officer, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website, in a Current Report on Form 8-K or both.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors. No member of the Compensation Committee is or has ever been an officer or employee of us or of any of our subsidiaries. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or of the compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or of our Compensation Committee.

Access to Management and Outside Advisors

Our directors have full and unrestricted access to our management and employees. Our Board of Directors and its committees have the right to retain outside advisors and consultants of their choosing at our expense, without the consent or approval of management.

Communications with the Board of Directors

While the Board believes that management speaks for our company, any stockholder who wishes to communicate directly with the Board of Directors, any committee of the Board or any individual director may do so by directing a written request addressed to such director or directors as follows:

Intellinetics, Inc.

2190 Dividend Dr.

Columbus, OH 43228

Attention: Chief Financial Officer

Communications directed to members of the Board will be forwarded to the intended Board members, unless such communications are deemed advertisements or promotional, clearly unrelated to our business or to Board or committee matters, or unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or otherwise unnecessary or inappropriate to forward.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors currently consists of fivesix members. Under our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, the members of the Board must be re-elected each year at the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders.Stockholders. Each director serves in office until the expiration of his term and until his successor is duly elected and qualified.

The terms of fiveall six directors expire at the Annual Meeting: Robert C. Schroeder, James F. DeSocio, Matthew L. Chretien, Rye D’Orazio, Robert C. Schroeder, Sophie Pibouin, and Murray Gross.Roger Kahn. Therefore, fivesix directors will be elected at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors has unanimously nominated Robert C. Schroeder, James F. DeSocio, Matthew L. Chretien, Rye D’Orazio, Robert C. Schroeder, Sophie Pibouin, and Murray GrossRoger Kahn to be re-elected as directors at the Annual Meeting, to serve as directors for a term of one year.

Robert C. Schroeder, James F. DeSocio, Matthew L. Chretien, Rye D’Orazio, Robert C. Schroeder, Sophie Pibouin, and Murray Gross,Roger Kahn, have each agreed to continue to serve as a director if re-elected by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve. However, if any nominee should become unexpectedly unable to serve as a director, then the persons appointed as proxies in the accompanying proxy card intend to vote for such other nominee as the Board of Directors may designate unless the size of the Board is reduced by the Board of Directors.

Set forth below is information as of the date of this proxy statement about the nominees and the continuing director.nominees. In addition to the information presented below regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee and of each continuing director that led our Board of Directors to conclude that such person should serve as a director, we also believe that each nominee and the continuing director has demonstrated a high level of leadership experience, business acumen, integrity and honesty, and an ability to exercise sound judgment and deal with complex problems, as well as a commitment of service to our company and our Board. Our Board of Directors believes that these skills and qualifications, combined with the diverse backgrounds, experience, expertise and perspectives of our directors, contribute to robust and productive discussions in the boardroom and the ability of the Board to work in a positive and collegial fashion that benefits our company and our stockholders by creating a strong and effective Board of Directors. The Board considers the composition of the Board in light of our evolving business requirements and its assessment of the Board’s performance to ensure that the Board has the appropriate mix of skills and experiences needed for the broad set of challenges that it confronts and the responsibilities it has. Based on all of these qualifications, the Board of Directors believes that each nominee and the continuing director has the appropriate set of skills and qualifications to serve as members of the Board and to benefit our company and our stockholders as Board members.

Nominees

Term Expires in 2016

Matthew L. Chretien, 46, was appointed interim President and Chief Executive Officer on July 31, 2013. He is a co-founder of Intellinetics and has served as Intellinetics’ Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer since September 2011. Matthew L. Chretien resigned from the Chief Financial Officer position in September 2012. From January 1999 until September 2011, Matthew L. Chretien was employed as Intellinetics’ President and Chief Executive Officer. From 1996 until 1999, Matthew L. Chretien was employed as Intellinetics’ Vice President. Prior to joining Intellinetics, Matthew L. Chretien served as the field sales engineer for Unison Industries, a manufacturer of aircraft ignition systems. As a co-founder who has been an active executive at all times since 1996, our Board believes Matthew L. Chretien is qualified to serve on our Board. He brings to the Board valuable leadership experience and insight with respect to our technology; products and services; and relationships with customers, vendors, and distributors. Matthew L. Chretien is the son of A. Michael Chretien.

Rye D’Orazio, 59, serves as a member of our board of directors, and has served as a director of Intellinetics Ohio since 2006. Rye D’Orazio has been a partner at Ray & Barney Group since 2001. From 1995 to 2000, Rye D’Orazio served as Vice President of Professional Services at Compucom. From 1985 to 1995, Rye D’Orazio was a partner at NCGroup, which he founded. From 1982 to 1995, Rye D’Orazio was employed as the Vice President of Professional Services at Triangle Systems, and from 1977 to 1982, Rye D’Orazio was employed as a systems engineer at Electronic Data Systems. Rye D’Orazio brings over 30 years of important industry experience and business acumen to our Board. Our Board believes that Rye D’Orazio’s experience and expertise, particularly with respect to professional services and entrepreneurship, qualify him to serve on our Board.

Robert C. Schroeder, 46,51, has served as a member of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors since September 10, 2013. Robert C.2013, and was appointed Chairman of the Board on October 5, 2017. Mr. Schroeder is Vice President of Investment Banking at Taglich Brothers, a brokerage firm, and specializes in advisory services and capital raising for small public and private companies. Prior to that, Robert C. Schroederhe served as Senior Equity Analyst publishing sell-side research on publicly traded companies. Prior to joining Taglich Brothers, he served in various positions in the brokerage and public accounting industry. Robert C.Mr. Schroeder received a B.S. degree in accounting and economics from New York University. He currently serves on the board of directors of publicly traded Air Industries Group, a manufacturer of aerospace parts and assemblies, and Decisionpoint Systems, Inc., a leading provider and integrator of Enterprise Mobility, Wireless Applications and RFID solutions. The Board believes Robert C.Mr. Schroeder is well qualified to serve on the Board due to his leadership skills, capital markets expertise, and extensive experience as a director of the board for other public companies.

Sophie Pibouin,James F. DeSocio, 47,62, is the current President, Chief Executive Officer, and has served as a member of our Board of Directors since September 25, 2017. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. DeSocio served as Chief Revenue Officer at Relayware, LLC, a global provider of Partner Relationship Management solutions, from January 2015 to September 2017. From January 2013 to November 2014, Mr. DeSocio served as Executive Vice President of Operations for XRS Corporation, a fleet management software solutions provider. From October 2007 to September 2012, Mr. DeSocio served as Executive Vice President of Sales and Business Development for Antenna Software, Inc., a business mobility solutions provider. Our Board believes Mr. DeSocio is qualified to serve on our Board due to his extensive experience in sales, marketing, international operations, and mergers and acquisitions.

Matthew L. Chretien, 50, is a co-founder of Intellinetics and has served as Secretary since December 19, 2017, Chief Strategy Officer since September 25, 2017, and Chief Technology Officer since September 2011, and as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2012. Mr. Chretien previously served as Intellinetics’ President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2013 to September 2017, and from January 1999 to September 2011; Executive Vice President from September 2011 to July 2013; Chief Financial Officer from September 2011 to September 2012; Treasurer from September 2011 to December 2016; and Vice President from 1996 until 1999. Prior to joining Intellinetics, he served as the field sales engineer for Unison Industries, a manufacturer of aircraft ignition systems. As a co-founder who has been an active executive at all times since 1996, our Board believes Mr. Matthew Chretien is qualified to serve on our Board. He brings to the Board valuable leadership experience and insight with respect to our technology; products and services; and relationships with customers, vendors, and distributors.

Rye D’Orazio, 63, has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Intellinetics since 2006. Rye D’Orazio has been a partner at Ray & Barney Group, a management consulting firm, since 2001. From 1995 to 2000, he served as Vice President of Professional Services at Compucom. From 1985 to 1995, Mr. D’Orazio was a partner at NCGroup, which he founded. From 1982 to 1995, he was employed as the Vice President of Professional Services at Triangle Systems, and from 1977 to 1982, he was employed as a systems engineer at Electronic Data Systems. Mr. D’Orazio brings over 30 years of important industry experience and business acumen to our Board. Our Board believes that Mr. D’Orazio’s experience and expertise, particularly with respect to professional services and entrepreneurship, qualify him to serve on our Board.

Sophie Pibouin,50, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since March 20, 2015. Prior to joining the Board, Ms. Pibouin served as Chief Operating Officer, from 2012 to 2014, for SDL, PLC, a global provider of customer experience management software and solutions, having previously worked as a General Manager from 2010 to 2012. From 2006 to 2009, she served as Chief Operating Officer at Chronicle Solutions, Inc., a security software company. From 1990 to 2004, she worked for CA, Inc. (formerly Computer Associates), in a variety of positions including ultimately as Senior Vice President/GM for the Mid-Atlantic Region. She graduated with Honors as a Bachelor in International Commerce from the University of Flaubert in Rouen, France. The Board believes Ms. Pibouin brings a depth and breadth of business experience in the software industry, and that she is qualified to serve on our Board.

Murray Gross,Roger Kahn 77,, 48, has served as a member of our Board since April 30, 2015. Prior to joining the Board,October 5, 2017. Mr. Gross was Chairman, CEO,Kahn has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (“Bridgeline”), a web content management solutions provider, since May 2016. Mr. Kahn previously served as Co-Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of US Home Systems (NASDAQ: USHS)Bridgeline from its inceptionDecember 2015 to May 2016, and as Chief Operating Officer from August 2015 to May 2016. From 2008 to September 2016, Mr. Kahn was a partner at Great Land Holdings, a resort development company. Mr. Kahn received his Ph.D. in 1997 through 2012. The Company grew to $180 million in sales when it was acquired by The Home Depot (NYSE: HD) in October 2012 for nearly $100 million. Prior to founding USHS, Gross wasComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence from the President and COOUniversity of Facelifters Home Systems from 1987 – 1996 when it was acquired by AMRE (NYSE: AMM) for $44 million. Gross began his entrepreneurial pursuits when he co-founded Pennsylvania-based Busy Beavers Remodelers. This Company was sold to its partner, Busy Beavers Home Centers, and both companies were acquired in 1972 by Cyclops Corporation, then number 240 on the Fortune 500 list. The Board believes that Mr. Gross brings extensive experience in building successful publicly held micro-cap companies, with proven expertise in marketing & sales management, finance, and mergers & acquisitions.Chicago. The Board believes Mr. GrossKahn is qualified to serve on ourthe Board due to his extensive business and management experience in the software industry and his past successful leadership ofwith a public companies.company.

Vote Required

Our Bylaws require that each director be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of our common stock present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting with respect to the directors. A “plurality of the votes cast” means that the fivesix candidates receiving the highest number of votes cast shall be elected as the fivesix directors.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE FIVESIX NOMINEES:

MATTHEWRobert C. Schroeder, James F. DeSocio, Matthew L. CHRETIEN, RYE D’ORAZIO, ROBERT C. SCHROEDER,SOPHIE PIBOUN, AND MURRAY GROSSChretien,

Rye D’Orazio, Sophie Pibouin, and Roger Kahn

Proxy cards properly signed and timely returned to us will be so voted,

unless contrary instructions are specified.

PROPOSAL 2

APPROVAL OF THE INTELLINETICS, INC.AMENDMENTS TO OUR 2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

At the Annual Meeting,We are asking our stockholders will be asked to adopt and approve the Intellinetics, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan which we referAmendments to as the 2015 Plan. In April 2015, our board unanimously adopted the 2015 Plan subjectin order to:

The Board of Directors believes that amending and restating the 2015 Plan is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders, because of the importance of being able to stockholder approval.continue to grant appropriate equity awards as a valuable tool to help attract, retain, motivate and reward our directors, officers, employees and other representatives. Accordingly, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has unanimously approved, and recommends that our stockholders adopt and approve, the proposed amendments to the 2015 Plan.

This Proposal 2, the approval of the Plan Amendments to our 2015 Plan, is not dependent or contingent upon the approval of Proposal 3, the adoption and approval of the proposed Charter Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares.

Background

The 2015 Plan was adopted by our Board of Directors in April 2015, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and was approved by our stockholders in August 2015. The 2015 Plan authorizes the boardBoard of Directors, which has delegated its authority under the 2015 Plan to the Compensation Committee, to grant non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), incentive stock options (“ISOs”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock awards, performance awards, and other stock-based awards to officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors of the Company. The 2015 Plan is the Company’s only active plan for providing equity incentives to such persons.

The Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee strongly believe that in orderthe 2015 Plan is a critical component of our overall compensation program and essential to our continued success. The purpose of the 2015 Plan is to assist us to successfully attract, retain, reward and motivate the best available officers, directors, employees, advisors and consultants we must continue to provideby providing them with an equity interest in our company in order to align their interestinterests with thosethe interests of our stockholders and to provide such persons with incentives to pursue the long-term growth, profitability and financial success of our company and to increase stockholder value. An equity incentive plan, providingThe 2015 Plan is also designed to allow us to take a full federal income tax deduction for stock-basedthe compensation paid to our executive officers in connection with certain awards is a critical part of our overall compensation program. Accordingly, our board of directors adopted, and recommends that our stockholders approve,granted under the 2015 Plan.

As originally adopted, a total of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan. As of April [13], 2018, under the current share counting formula, no shares of our common stock remain available for issuance under the 2015 Plan pursuant to future awards, not including any shares that might in the future be returned to the 2015 Plan as a result of awards expiring, being forfeited or otherwise terminating. As of the date of this proxy statement, all awards under the 2015 Plan have been grants of either stock options or restricted stock.

In addition, on September 25, 2017, 250,000 of ISOs were contingently granted to an employee, subject to vesting requirements and contingent upon the approval by the shareholders of an amendment to the 2015 Plan to increase the amount of shares reserved under the Plan. Thus, even if the current proposal is approved, only 1,250,000 will be available for new grants, assuming no other existing grants are forfeited by the recipients.

On April [13], 2018, the last reported sale price of our common stock as reported on OTCQB was [$0.18] per share.

Proposed Plan Amendments

On September 25, 2017, and February 19, 2018, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors adopted, subject to stockholder approval, and is recommending that stockholders adopt and approve at the Annual Meeting, the Plan Amendments. The Board of Directors believes that the Plan Amendments are important to allow us to continue to meet the goals of our overall compensation program and are necessary to help drive our continued success.

Under the Plan Amendments, the number of shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan would be increased by 1,500,000 shares to a total of 3,500,000 shares.

Under the Plan Amendments, we are also proposing to increase the limit for the number of incentive stock options that can be issued under the 2015 Plan from 1,000,000 to 3,500,000.

The Plan Amendments also propose to increase the maximum number of shares of common stock for which awards may be granted to any individual in any year from 1,000,000 shares to 1,250,000 shares.

The proposed Plan Amendments of the 2015 Plan will become effective immediately upon stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting. No Incentive Stock OptionOther than the grant of 250,000 ISOs to James F. DeSocio (which grant is contingent upon shareholder approval of the Plan Amendments), no grants or awards will be made with respect to the additional shares that will be authorized under the 2015 Plan Amendments unless and until stockholders approve the 2015 Plan.Plan Amendments. If stockholders do not approve the proposed Plan Amendments, then the proposed Plan Amendments will not become effective, the 2015 Plan it will continue in effect after the Annual Meeting as currently in effect without any Plan Amendments, and the 250,000 ISOs granted to James F. DeSocio on a contingent basis would be modified to remove Incentive Stock Option treatment for employees.forfeit.

Summary of the 2015 Plan

The principal features of the 2015 Plan, as proposed to be amended, are summarized below. The following summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2015 Plan.Plan and the Plan Amendments. The full text of the 2015 Plan isand the Plan Amendments are attached to this proxy statement asAppendix A.

Purpose.The purpose of the 2015 Plan is to attract, retain, reward and motivate the best available officers, directors, employees, advisors and consultants by providing them with an equity interest in order to align their interests with those of our stockholders and providing such persons with incentives to promote our long-term growth and profitability and the success of our business and to enhance stockholder value. The 2015 Plan is also designed to permit us to make cash- and equity-based awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The 2015 Plan will become effective immediately upon stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting.

Shares Available for Issuance. If stockholders approve the 2015 Plan, a total of 2,000,0003,500,000 shares of our common stock will be authorized and reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan, subject to adjustment for certain changes in our capital structure. The shares of common stock issuable under the 2015 Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares, including shares repurchased by us in the open market (other than with the proceeds of stock option exercises).

The number of shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan will beis reduced by one share for each share of common stock issued upon exercise or settlement of all awards. In the event that an award expires or is cancelled, forfeited, settled in cash or otherwise terminated before delivery of all or some of the shares subject to such award, then the number of shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan will be increased by one share for each share subject to an value.Theaward value. The 2015 Plan counts shares on a “gross” basis and does not allow the re-grant of shares withheld or surrendered in payment of the exercise price or tax withholding obligations of an award. To the extent permitted by applicable law or any stock exchange rule, shares issued or issuable in connection with any award issued in substitution for any outstanding award of any entity acquired in any form of combination by us or our subsidiaries will notare be counted against the shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan.

On July 10, 2015, the closing sale price of our common stock as quoted on the OTCBB was $0.71.

Administration.The 2015 Plan will beis administered by the Compensation Committee or another committee appointed by our board of directors, unless our board decides at any time to administer the 2015 Plan. The committee will beis currently comprised of three or more directors who are not our officers or employees and who meet certain other criteria under applicable federal securities law and federal tax law provisions, including meeting the definition of “non-employee directors” under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act and meeting the definition of “outside directors” under Section 162(m) of the Code. The members of the board and of the committee will beare eligible for awards under the 2015 Plan. If the board of directors at any time decides to administer the 2015 Plan, it will have all of the powers of the committee under the 2015 Plan.

The committee is authorized to designate which participants will receive awards, determine the type and number of awards to be granted, set the terms, conditions and provisions of awards (including the exercise price, the exercisability and vesting and the form of consideration payable upon exercise of awards), cancel awards, prescribe forms of award agreements, interpret the 2015 Plan, establish, amend and rescind rules and regulations related to the 2015 Plan, and make all other determinations which may be necessary or advisable to the administration of the 2015 Plan or the grant of awards under the 2015 Plan, subject to the terms and conditions of the 2015 Plan. The board or the committee may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, delegate the authority to grant or amend awards to one or more of our officers or non-employee directors. Any such officer or non-employee director will not be delegated the authority to grant awards to our officers.

Eligibility.The officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisers of our company and of our existing or future subsidiaries who, in the determination of the board or committee, are responsible for or contribute to our management, growth, profitability and successful performance are eligible to receive awards under the 2015 Plan. All of our employees, all four of our non-employee directors, and in general our advisors and consultants are eligible to receive awards under the 2015 Plan. However, only our employees are eligible to receive awards of incentive stock options under the 2015 Plan.

Limitations. During any calendar year, the maximum number of shares that can be granted to any individual participant subject to awards under the 2015 Plan is 1,000,000will be 1,250,000 shares, and the maximum amount of cash payable under awards, even performance-based awards, to any individual participant is $1 million. In addition, the maximum number of shares that can be issued upon exercise of incentive stock options awarded under the 2015 Plan is 1,000,000.

Awards. The 2015 Plan provides that the committee may grant or issue stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock, dividend equivalents, performance awards and other stock-based compensation awards or any combination thereof to our officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors. These awards may be granted on the terms and conditions described in the 2015 Plan .Each award will beis evidenced by a separate agreement with the grantee of the award and will indicate the type, terms and conditions of the award.

Stock Options. Under the 2015 Plan, the committee is authorized to grant stock options, which can be either incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options. A stock option is the right to purchase shares of our common stock at a fixed exercise price for a fixed period of time. The committee will determine the number of shares that can be exercised under a stock option. In addition, the exercise price of stock options will be determined by the board or committee but may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant (or 110% of the fair market value in the case of an incentive stock option granted to an employee beneficially owning more than 10% of our outstanding common stock). The committee may grant non-qualified stock options to any eligible participant, but may grant incentive stock options only to employees. Stock options will become exercisable at such time or times in whole or in part as determined by the committee, except that stock options may not be exercised later than 10 years after the date of grant (5 years after grant in the case of an incentive stock option granted to an employee beneficially owning more than 10% of our outstanding common stock). Stock options may be exercised by payment of the exercise price in cash, shares of our common stock, cashless exercise, exchange of outstanding awards or other property, or in any combination of those methods having a fair market value equal to the exercise price, as the committee determines. Stock options are generally not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and may be exercised during the optionee’s lifetime only by the optionee.

Stock Appreciation Rights.The 2015 Plan authorizes the committee to grant stock appreciation rights, either alone or in tandem with underlying stock options. Stock appreciation rights entitle the participant to receive, upon exercise, an amount of cash or shares or some combination of both, as determined by the committee, equal in value to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares covered by the stock appreciation right on the date of exercise over the base price of the stock appreciation right. The base price for stock appreciation rights will be fixed by the committee but will not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights will be exercisable at such time or times and under such other terms and conditions as determined by the committee, except that stock appreciation rights may not be exercised later than 10 years from the date of grant.

Prohibition on Repricing Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The 2015 Plan prohibits the direct or indirect repricing of outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under the 2015 Plan, without stockholder approval. For example, the exercise price of stock options or the base price of stock appreciation rights outstanding under the 2015 Plan are not permitted to be reduced, outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights are not permitted to be exchanged for stock options or stock appreciation rights with a lower exercise or base price, and underwater stock options and stock appreciation rights are not permitted to be exchanged for cash, shares, other property or other awards, without stockholder approval.

Restricted Stock. The 2015 Plan also authorizes the award of restricted stock. An award of restricted stock is an award of shares of common stock that vests in accordance with such terms and conditions, and is subject to such restrictions, as the committee determines. The terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to an award of restricted stock may be based on service conditions, performance goals, other conditions or a combination of all of those as the committee determines to be appropriate. The restricted stock vests and may be disposed of by the participant only in accordance with those terms and conditions and after such restrictions lapse in whole or in installments as the committee determines. Restricted stock awards may be subject to forfeiture if, for example, the participant’s employment terminates before the award vests. A participant receiving restricted stock has all the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote the shares and the right to receive any dividends, unless the committee otherwise determines.

Restricted Stock Units. The 2015 Plan also authorizes the award of restricted stock units. A restricted stock unit is the right to receive a share of common stock upon the completion of a vesting period. The board or committee determines the terms and conditions, including vesting, of restricted stock units. As with awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units vest in accordance with terms and conditions, and are subject to such restrictions, as the committee determines, and those terms, conditions and restrictions may be based on service conditions, performance goals, other conditions or a combination of all of those as the committee determines to be appropriate. However, unlike an award of restricted stock, a participant receiving restricted stock units has no rights of a stockholder until the restricted stock unit vests and the shares are issued.

Deferred Stock.The 2015 Plan also authorizes the committee to make deferred stock awards, generally consisting of a right to receive shares of our common stock at the end of specified deferral periods. Awards of deferred stock are subject to such conditions or limitations as the committee may impose, which conditions or limitations may lapse at the end of the deferral period in installments or otherwise. Deferred stock awards carry no voting or dividend rights or other rights associated with stock ownership. Upon termination of employment during the restriction or deferral period, deferred stock will be forfeited subject to such exceptions, if any, as are authorized by the committee.

Bonus Shares and Awards in Lieu of Obligations.The committee is authorized under the 2015 Plan to grant shares of common stock to eligible persons as a bonus or in lieu of obligations (such as salary requirements) to pay cash or deliver other property, subject to such terms as determined by the committee.

Performance Awards.Under the 2015 Plan, the committee may make a performance award, which is an award of a number of units that represents the right to receive a specified number of shares of common stock or cash, or both, upon satisfaction of certain specified performance criteria, as applicable to us or any subsidiary, division, business unit or individual, subject to such terms and conditions as the committee determines. Performance awards will be earned to the extent such performance goals established by the committee are achieved over a period of time specified by the committee. The performance objectives may vary from participant to participant, group to group and period to period. The performance objectives for awards intended to constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” (see discussion below under the heading “—Summary of Federal Income Tax Consequences”) will include, but not be limited to, the following: earnings per share and growth in earnings per share; gross or net sales, revenues and growth of sales or revenues; cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow); return on investment; return on net assets, assets, capital or equity; economic value added; operating margins; gross or net profit margin; income or net income (before or after taxes); pre-tax income before interest, depreciation and amortization; pre-tax operating earnings after interest expense and before extraordinary or special items; operating income or net operating income; operating profit or net operating profit; total stockholder returns; price of the shares (and changes thereof); cost reductions or savings; research and development expenses; productivity; expenses; operating efficiency; customer satisfaction; working capital; market share; and any of the above goals as compared to the performance of a published or special index deemed applicable by the committee. Performance goals may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or decrease or as compared to the results of a peer group, and may reflect the results of our company on a consolidated basis or any one or more of our subsidiaries, divisions or other business units. The committee has the discretion to determine the value of each performance award, to adjust the performance goal as it deems equitable to reflect events affecting the us or changes in law or accounting principles or other factors, and to determine the extent to which performance awards that are earned may be paid in the form of cash, deferred cash, shares of common stock or other awards or property, or a combination thereof.

Dividend Equivalents.The committee is authorized to grant dividend equivalents conferring on a participant the right to receive an amount equal to the value of dividends per share paid by us, if any, calculated with reference to a specified number of shares of our common stock. Dividend equivalents may be granted in connection with full value awards granted under the 2015 Plan. Dividend equivalents may be paid in cash or shares of our common stock, or in a combination of both, at the election of the committee. No dividend equivalents will be payable with respect to stock options or stock appreciation rights.

Stand-Alone, Additional, Tandem and Substitute Awards.Awards granted under the 2015 Plan may, in the discretion of the committee, be granted either alone or in addition to or in tandem with any other award granted under the 2015 Plan or any award granted under any other plan we may adopt from time to time. Generally, awards may not be granted in substitution for another award under the 2015 Plan, or retroactively in tandem with another award under the 2015 Plan at an exercise or base price lower than that of the previously granted award, without stockholder approval. However, the committee may grant shares or awards under the 2015 Plan in assumption of, or substitution or exchange for, options or other awards granted, or the right or obligation to grant future options or other awards, by a company involved in a corporate transaction with us.

Other Stock-Based Awards.In order to enable us to respond to material developments in the area of taxes and other legislation and regulations and interpretations thereof, and to trends in executive compensation practices, the 2015 Plan authorizes the committee to grant awards that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to our securities in addition to those specifically described in the 2015 Plan. These awards must be valued in whole or in part by reference to, or must otherwise be based on, the shares of our common stock, or the cash equivalent of such shares. These awards may be granted wither alone, in addition to, or in tandem with, other awards granted under the 2015 Plan or cash awards made outside the 2015 Plan. The committee will determine the terms and conditions of such awards, including the consideration paid for awards as purchase rights, which consideration generally may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date that the purchase right is granted. These awards may include, without limitation, performance shares and restricted stock units that entitle the participant to receive, upon satisfaction of performance goals or other conditions, a specified number of shares of common stock or the cash equivalent thereof.

Vesting of Awards. The applicable award agreement governing an award will contain the period during which the right to exercise the award in whole or in part vests, including the events or conditions upon which the vesting of any award may accelerate.

Transferability of Awards.Under the 2015 Plan, awards are generally not assignable or transferable by a participant, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order, except to us under the terms of the 2015 Plan, and except that, upon approval by the committee, non-qualified stock options and SARs may be transferred by participants to immediate family members, to trusts for the benefit of immediate family members and to partnerships or similar entities in which such participant and the participant’s immediate family members are the only parties or members.

Acceleration of Awards Upon Change in Control.The 2015 Plan provides that in the event of our “change in control” (as defined in the 2015 Plan and subject to limitations due to Section 409A of the Code), all outstanding awards under the 2015 Plan, regardless of any limitations or restrictions, will immediately vest and become fully exercisable, and all restrictions applicable to outstanding restricted stock, performance awards and other stock-based awards will lapse, unless otherwise provided by the committee at the time of grant of the award or unless waived or deferred by the participants.

Amendment and Termination of the 2015 Plan. The board of directors has the right to amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the 2015 Plan at any time without the consent of the stockholders or participants, except that (i) stockholder approval of such action will be required if such approval is required by any federal or state law or regulation or stock exchange or stock market rule, regulation or policy, or if the board in its discretion determines that obtaining such stockholder approval is advisable, and (ii) subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, no amendment or termination of the 2015 Plan may materially and adversely affect the rights of a participant under any award granted under the 2015 Plan without the consent of the affected participant. Unless earlier terminated by the board, the 2015 Plan will terminate on April 30, 2025, the tenth anniversary of the adoption of the Plan by the board of directors, and no award may be granted under the 2015 Plan after that date, although awards granted prior to that date will remain in full force and effect subject to their terms.

The committee may amend or terminate outstanding awards under the 2015 Plan, unless expressly prohibited by the 2015 Plan. However, the amendment or termination of any award that materially reduces the value of an award or otherwise impairs or adversely affects the rights of the participant under such award will require the consent of the participant.

Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization. In the event that our stock changes by reason of any dividend (excluding an ordinary dividend) or other distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, liquidation, dissolution, sale, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, exchange of our securities, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase common stock or other of our securities, or other similar transaction or change in our capital structure, then the committee will make equitable adjustments to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2015 Plan by making appropriate adjustments to the number and class of shares with respect to which awards may be granted under the 2015 Plan, the maximum number of shares that may be issued to any individual in any fiscal year pursuant to awards, the terms and conditions of any outstanding awards, and the number and kind of shares and the exercise price of any outstanding award under the 2015 Plan.

Section 409A. Section 409A of the Code generally establishes very specific requirements that must be followed with respect to covered deferred compensation plans in order to avoid the imposition of an additional 20% federal income tax (plus interest) on the service provider who is entitled to receive the deferred compensation. Certain awards that may be granted under the 1998 Plan may constitute “deferred compensation” within the meaning of and subject to Section 409A. The 2015 Plan is intended to be interpreted and operated in accordance with Section 409A, including any regulations or guidance issued by the Treasury Department, and contains a number of provisions intended to avoid the imposition of additional tax on 2015 Plan recipients under Section 409A. The 2015 Plan contains provisions intended to assist the committee in complying with Section 409A including, among other things, the authority to amend the 2015 Plan and outstanding awards to preserve the intended benefits of awards granted under the 2015 Plan and to avoid the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A. For example, if the committee determines that any awards made under the 2015 Plan will be taxable to a participant under Section 409A, then prior to exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights by such participant or payment of other awards to such participant, the committee may amend the 2015 Plan and any outstanding awards, including retroactively, if the committee, if any, determines it is necessary or appropriate to do so to preserve the intended tax treatment of the awards granted under the 2015 Plan. The committee also may take other actions it determines necessary or appropriate to avoid the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A.

Summary of Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a brief and general summary of certain federal income tax consequences of awards that may be granted under the 2015 Plan. This summary is based upon the Code, the applicable treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial authority and administrative ruling and practice, all as currently in effect. Legislative, judicial or administrative rules and interpretations are subject to change, potentially on a retroactive basis, at any time, and such changes could alter or modify the statements and conclusions set forth below. This summary does not purport to be complete and does not address all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to a particular participant in light of such participant’s personal investment circumstances or participants subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws. The summary also does not address the effects of foreign, state or local tax consequences. The 2015 Plan is not a tax-qualified deferred compensation plan under Section 401(a) of the Code, and is not subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

Incentive Stock Options.A participant who is granted an incentive stock option will not recognize any taxable income at the time the incentive stock option is granted or exercised, although the amount by which the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise exceeds the option exercise price is an adjustment item for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. If the participant holds the shares received upon the exercise of the incentive stock option for at least one year after the date of exercise and two years after the date of grant, referred to as the “holding period”, then any difference between the amount realized upon the disposition of the shares and the exercise price will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss to the participant. We will not have any tax consequences from the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option (except as discussed below) if the participant satisfies the holding period requirements.

If a participant exercises an incentive stock option but does not satisfy the holding period requirements above, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of disposition of the shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise over the option exercise price, and any excess of the amount realized on such disposition over the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise will be taxed as long-term or short-term capital gain, as applicable. If the participant disposes of the shares prior to the satisfaction of the holding period requirements but the amount realized is less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal only on the excess of the amount realized upon the disposition of the shares over the option exercise price. In either event, we will be entitled to a tax deduction in an amount equal to the amount constituting ordinary income to the participant.

If a participant exercises an incentive stock option by tendering shares (other than the shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option and not held for the requisite holding period) in payment of all or part of the option exercise price, the participant will not be required to recognize any taxable income from the exchange and option exercise, and the participant’s tax basis and holding period (for capital gain purposes) for the tendered shares will be treated as a substituted basis for the shares received upon the exercise of the incentive stock option. If the participant uses shares received upon the exercise of an incentive stock option as to which the participant had not satisfied the applicable holding period requirements, the exchange will be treated as a taxable disqualifying disposition of the exchanged shares, with the result of the excess of the fair market value of the shares tendered over the participant’s basis in such shares would be taxable.

Non-Qualified Stock Options.A participant who is granted a non-qualified stock option will not recognize any taxable income, and we will not have any tax consequences, at the time the non-qualified stock option is granted. In general, upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, a participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the option exercise price, and we will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount in the year the participant exercises the non-qualified stock option. Upon subsequent disposition of shares acquired upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, a participant will have a capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the participant’s tax basis in the shares, which is generally the amount paid for the shares plus the amount treated as ordinary income at the time the non-qualified stock option was exercised. Such capital gain or loss will be long-term if the participant’s holding period is longer than one year, and short-term otherwise. The participant’s taxable disposition of the shares acquired upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option will not result in any additional tax consequences to us.

Stock Appreciation Rights.The grant of a stock appreciation right will create no federal income tax consequences for the participant or us. When a participant exercises a stock appreciation right, the amount of any cash received and the fair market value on the date of exercise of any shares received will constitute ordinary income to the participant, and we will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount in the year of exercise.

Restricted Stock.The federal income tax consequences of restricted stock awards depend upon the restrictions imposed on the restricted stock. In the absence of an election under Section 83(b) of the Code by a participant, the grant of restricted stock will not result in taxable income to the participant or entitle us to a tax deduction in the year of grant if the restricted stock received is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and is either non-transferable or after transfer remains subject to such substantial risk of forfeiture. In such case, a participant must recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock received as of the first date the restricted stock becomes either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs earlier. However, a participant may, in his or her discretion, make a Section 83(b) election to recognize as ordinary income the value of the restricted stock as of the date of receipt rather than upon lapse of restrictions on transferability or the substantial risk of forfeiture. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in the amount of the fair market value of the restricted stock transferred to the participant in the year the participant recognizes ordinary income. Prior to the lapse of restrictions, dividends paid on restricted stock will be taxable to the participant as ordinary income in the year such restricted stock is received free of restrictions, and we will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount.

Restricted Stock Units and Deferred Stock. A participant who receives an award of restricted stock units or a deferred stock award will generally not recognize any taxable income, and we will not have any tax consequences, at the time the award of restricted stock units or a deferred stock is granted. When a participant receives the shares of common stock under the terms of the award, the fair market value on the date of exercise of the shares received, less any amount paid by the participant for such shares, will constitute ordinary income to the participant, and we will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount in the year of exercise.

Dividend Equivalent Awards.A participant who receives a dividend equivalent award generally will not recognize any taxable income, and we will not have any tax consequences, at the time the dividend equivalent award is granted. When a participant is paid for the award, the amount of any cash received and the fair market value on the date any shares are received will constitute ordinary income to the participant, and we will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount in the year of the award is paid.

Performance Awards.A participant who receives a performance award of shares of common stock will generally recognize ordinary income in the year the award is received equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of award. We will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant in the year such income is recognized.

Other Stock-Based Awards.A participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of any cash payments or the fair market value of any shares of common stock or other property received in connection with other stock-based awards (less any amounts paid by the participant) in the year the stock-based award is received or made available to the participant without substantial restrictions or risk of forfeiture in a manner consistent with the treatment of restricted stock. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount and at the same time the participant recognizes such ordinary income.

Section 162(m).Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits the deductible amount of annual compensation paid (including, unless an exception applies, compensation otherwise deductible in connection with awards granted under the 2015 Plan) by a public company to the chief executive officer and to the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company to no more than $1,000,000 per person. This limit, however, does not apply to “qualified performance-based compensation.” We generally intend to structure any stock options and other awards granted under the 2015 Plan that might be affected by Section 162(m) of the Code to comply with the performance-based compensation exemption to the deductibility limit.

Section 409A. The 2015 Plan permits the grant of various types of incentive awards, which may or may not be exempt from Section 409A of the Code. The tax consequences (including the amounts and the timing of those tax consequences) described above assume that an award is not subject to or does not violate the requirements of Section 409A. If an award is subject to Section 409A, and if the requirements of Section 409A are not met, the taxable events as described above could apply earlier than described, and could result in the imposition of additional taxes and penalties. Stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock awards that comply with the terms of the 2015 Plan and do not have a deferral feature, and are not amended, are generally exempt from the application of Section 409A, which is applicable to deferred compensation plans within the meaning of Section 409A. Restricted stock units, deferred stock awards and performance shares granted under the 2015 Plan are generally subject to Section 409A unless they are designed to satisfy the short-term deferral exemption from Section 409A. Awards that do not comply with Section 409A can result in the value of the deferred compensation being currently includable in the service provider’s federal income tax purposes and being taxed at the service provider’s marginal federal income tax rate plus an additional 20%, and interest and penalties may be included.

New Plan Benefits

NoOther than the grant of 250,000 contingent ISOs to James F. DeSocio (which grant is contingent upon shareholder approval of the Plan Amendments), no incentive stock option awards will be granted under the 2015 Plan unless and until the 2015 Plan has been approved by our stockholders. The grant of awards under the 2015 Plan to eligible directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors, including the named executive officers, is subject to the discretion of the committee and therefore cannot be determined in advance, other than the grants of restricted stock payable to non-employee directors on a formula basis as discussed under “Director Compensation” below. For a description of the options granted during the fiscal year 2017 to the Named Executive Officers under the 2015 Plan, please see the “Summary Compensation Table” and the “Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year” table below under “Executive Compensation.” As of the date of this proxy statement, and other than with respect to the contingent ISOs held by James F. DeSocio, as set forth above, no determination has been made as to which or how many of the persons eligible to receive awards under the 2015 Plan will receive future awards under the 2015 Plan, except that the board of directors has approved the grant of non-qualified stock options to two of our non-employee directors as discussed under “Director Compensation” below.Plan. Accordingly, except as otherwise provided above, the benefits or amounts that will be received by or allocated to individuals or groups under the 2015 Plan in the future are not presently determinable.

The following table sets forth information as of April [13], 2018 regarding awards that have been granted under our 2015 Plan to (i) each of our named executive officers, (ii) our named executive officers as a group, (iii) our directors who are not named executive officers as a group, and (iv) our employees who are not named executive officers as a group: